Tuesday, June 28, 2022
manilastandard.net
ADVERTISEMENT
  • About
  • News
    • Top Stories
    • National
    • World News
    • Pinoy Abroad
    • Features
  • Opinion
    • Editorial
    • Columns
    • Soundbytes
  • LGUs
    • NCR
    • Luzon
    • Visayas
    • Mindanao
  • Business
    • Corporate
    • Economy & Trade
    • Stocks
    • Money
    • Agri & Mining
    • Power & Tech
    • IT & Telecom
  • Sports
    • Basketball
    • Volleyball
    • Fightsports
    • Active
    • Sports Plus
    • One Championship
    • Columns
  • Entertainment
    • TV & Movies
    • Celebrity Profiles
    • Music & Concerts
    • Digital Media
    • Columns
  • Lifestyle
    • Food
    • Culture & Media
    • Fashion
    • Health and Home
    • Leisure
    • Shopping
    • Columns
  • Others
    • Pets
    • Pop.Life
      • Newsmakers
      • Hangouts
      • A-Pop
      • Post Its
      • Performances
      • Malls & Bazaars
      • Hobbies & Collections
    • Technology
      • Gadgets
      • Computers
      • Business
      • Tech Plus
    • MS ON THE ROAD
      • Sedan
      • SUV
      • Truck
      • Bike
      • Accessories
      • Motoring Plus
      • Commuter’s Corner
    • Home & Design
      • Residential
      • Commercial
      • Construction
      • Interior
    • Spotlight
    • Gallery
      • Photos
      • Videos
    • Events
      • Seminars
      • Exhibits
      • Community
    • Biyahero
      • Travel Features
      • Travel Reels
      • Travel Logs
  • Advertise with Us
No Result
View All Result
  • About
  • News
    • Top Stories
    • National
    • World News
    • Pinoy Abroad
    • Features
  • Opinion
    • Editorial
    • Columns
    • Soundbytes
  • LGUs
    • NCR
    • Luzon
    • Visayas
    • Mindanao
  • Business
    • Corporate
    • Economy & Trade
    • Stocks
    • Money
    • Agri & Mining
    • Power & Tech
    • IT & Telecom
  • Sports
    • Basketball
    • Volleyball
    • Fightsports
    • Active
    • Sports Plus
    • One Championship
    • Columns
  • Entertainment
    • TV & Movies
    • Celebrity Profiles
    • Music & Concerts
    • Digital Media
    • Columns
  • Lifestyle
    • Food
    • Culture & Media
    • Fashion
    • Health and Home
    • Leisure
    • Shopping
    • Columns
  • Others
    • Pets
    • Pop.Life
      • Newsmakers
      • Hangouts
      • A-Pop
      • Post Its
      • Performances
      • Malls & Bazaars
      • Hobbies & Collections
    • Technology
      • Gadgets
      • Computers
      • Business
      • Tech Plus
    • MS ON THE ROAD
      • Sedan
      • SUV
      • Truck
      • Bike
      • Accessories
      • Motoring Plus
      • Commuter’s Corner
    • Home & Design
      • Residential
      • Commercial
      • Construction
      • Interior
    • Spotlight
    • Gallery
      • Photos
      • Videos
    • Events
      • Seminars
      • Exhibits
      • Community
    • Biyahero
      • Travel Features
      • Travel Reels
      • Travel Logs
  • Advertise with Us
No Result
View All Result
manilastandard.net
No Result
View All Result
Home Opinion Columns

Perpetuation of testimony in heinous crimes

Tranquil G.S. Salvador IIIbyTranquil G.S. Salvador III
April 1, 2022, 12:30 am
in Columns, Footnotes by Tranquil G.S. Salvador III, Opinion
Reading Time: 5 mins read
A A
1.1k
SHARES
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on Email

“There is a void in gathering the testimonies of vital witnesses immediately after the commission of heinous crimes.”

I usually base my articles on existing laws and jurisprudence, but I am making an exception for this week’s article. I intend to bring to the attention of those who will assume positions in the 19th Congress of the Philippines, the absence of a law on gathering competent and relevant testimonies immediately after the commission of heinous crimes, especially before the case is filed in criminal courts, or when the witnesses are not found in or are outside of the Philippines.

Crimes are classified as heinous for being grievous, odious, and hateful. These acts are inherently wicked, vicious, atrocious, and perverse, making them repugnant to the common standards and norms of decency and morality (Republic Act 7659). Examples are treason, parricide, murder, rape, kidnapping and serious illegal detention, robbery with violence, destructive arson, and plunder, among others.

While there is a legal process at the level of the Office of the Prosecutor (OP) that determines whether a crime has been probably committed by the suspect, it may take time before the OP ascertains it. During this period, the witnesses of both the offended party and the accused may be vulnerable to duress, violence, undue influence, or physical harm that may later affect the truthfulness and accuracy of their testimonies in court.

There is evidently a gap in the Rules on how to protect the testimonies of the witnesses before the case is filed by the OP in court and the State commences to prosecute. This is a cause for concern of lawyers and parties in criminal cases because witnesses may depart from the Philippines with no definite date of return, may die, become sick or infirm, or be oppressed or harassed by interested parties, before they are presented in court.

Some say that affidavits submitted before law enforcement officers and prosecutors during preliminary investigation are sufficient protection for these testimonies, but these are worthless in the absence of an opportunity that should be given to the adverse party to cross-examine the witnesses. This is because cross-examination only takes place during the deposition or trial for a case in court and not during the preliminary investigation.

ADVERTISEMENT

Others also say that there are provisions in the Rules on Criminal Procedure that deal with a witness who is sick or infirm, about to depart from the Philippines, or is located more than 100 kilometers from the venue of the hearing. However, these provisions on the Conditional Examination of witnesses for the prosecution and accused only apply if the criminal case has been filed in court and the necessity of preserving the testimony arises before the actual trial (Sections 12, 13 and 15, Rule 119).

Additionally, conservative legal thinkers say that there is a provision in the Rules on Criminal Procedure on the discharge of an accused as a state witness (Section 117, Rule 119). However, this provision provides only the immunity of the discharged accused from conviction and preservation of his testimony in court. It does not include the preservation of witnesses’ testimonies before the filing of a criminal case.

Neither does the Witness Protection, Security and Benefit Act (Republic Act 6981), offer sufficient protection for the gathering of witness testimonies in heinous crimes or felonies because: (a) not all material witnesses may qualify under the witness protection program and even if they do, they will have to wait for trial; (b) while witnesses are protected from threat, intimidation, or harassment, their testimonies may still be corrupted before they are presented in court; and (c) witnesses may linger in safehouses that can lead them to forget the substance of their testimonies.

There is also the potential danger of witnesses being threatened, intimidated, or harassed by their guards, who may be used as conduits by interest groups to distort the witnesses’ testimonies when presented in court. Furthermore, the female witnesses may, due to unnecessary personal familiarity with their guards, be susceptible to sexual indiscretion which may result in unintentional pregnancies.

Risk reduction may be achieved by competent courts receiving testimonies (not necessarily the court where the criminal cases are assigned) immediately after the occurrence of the crimes, provided that witnesses in these cases are subject to cross-examination by the adverse party or suspect. Unfortunately, there are no laws on this matter.

Perpetuation of testimony would have been an ideal procedural option to preserve the testimonies of witnesses before a case is filed in court. Unfortunately, perpetuation of testimony in our Rules applies only to civil or commercial litigation either by: (a) taking the deposition (testimony) solely in the action initiated for that purpose; or (b) a deposition pending appeal in an already pending civil case (Rule 24, Rules of Civil Procedure).

The perpetuation of testimony is utilized when a person threatened with or exposed to a suit is unable to bring the issue to an immediate judicial determination. It may also be availed by a person who intends to institute an action for the purpose of establishing his rights regarding a particular matter but is unable to do so (Evidence, Francisco, 1996 citing 16 Am. Jur. 702).

The provision on perpetuation of testimony, specifically Rule 134, was originally part of the Rules on Evidence adopted by the Supreme Court on March 14, 1989. However, when the Rules of Civil Procedure was amended in 1997, the provision on perpetuation of testimony was transferred to Rule 24 to form part of the modes of discovery now known as Depositions before action or Pending appeal.

In the case of People v. Sergio and Lacanilao, the Supreme Court was faced with the problem of applying Rule 23 on Depositions Pending Action, used in civil cases, to a criminal case instead of using the Conditional examination of witness for the prosecution, which is under the Rules on Criminal Procedure (Section 15, Rule 119). This legal issue was brought about by the conditions laid down by the Indonesian government in taking the written interrogatories of the convicted Marie Jane Veloso (Veloso) who is imprisoned in Yogyakarta, Indonesia.

The Indonesian authorities imposed the following conditions on the taking of Veloso’s testimony, that: (a) she will remain in detention in Yogyakarta, Indonesia; (b) no cameras shall be allowed; (c) the lawyers of the parties shall not be present; and (d) the questions shall be forwarded in writing (G.R. No. 240053, October 9, 2019).

The written interrogatories were supposed to be used in the prosecution of Cristina Sergio and Julius Lacanilao in the Philippines for qualified human trafficking, illegal recruitment, and estafa. The request for written interrogatories was prompted by a statement of Veloso in her Sinumpaang Salaysay that a certain “Ike”, brother of “Prince” (boyfriend of Cristina), “handed to her the bag containing the prohibited drugs”.

In applying Rule 23 of the Rules of Civil Procedure to a criminal case, the Supreme Court was guided by the principle that rules shall be liberally construed in order to promote their objective of securing a just, speedy and inexpensive disposition of every action and proceeding. To deny the prosecution’s motion to take deposition by written interrogatories is to silence Veloso and deny her and the People of their right to due process (G.R. No. 240053, October 9, 2019).

Evidently, there is a void in gathering the testimonies of vital witnesses immediately after the commission of heinous crimes. Solutions must be forwarded for the protection of the testimonies of witnesses during the period spanning from preliminary investigation to the filing of the criminal information in court; as well as for the gathering of testimonies when witnesses are outside of or not found in the Philippines for reasons beyond their control.

Tags: heinous crimesTestimonyTranquil G.S. Salvadore III
ADVERTISEMENT
Tranquil G.S. Salvador III

Tranquil G.S. Salvador III

Related Posts

Good going to CHED commissioner

byManila Standard
June 28, 2022, 12:15 am
0
191
Good going to CHED commissioner

More than a week back, Commission on Higher Education Commissioner Dr. Ronald Adamat formally received the Mahatma MK Gandhi Peace...

Read more

The political will of Marcos

byEmil Jurado
June 28, 2022, 12:10 am
0
422
Denying Villafuerte justice

"If there’s one thing that the incoming President will prove to all and sundry is that he is willing to...

Read more

Big and Little Presidents

byTony La Viña
June 28, 2022, 12:05 am
0
229
Denying Villafuerte justice

"The President serves as commander-in-chief of the Armed Forces with calling out powers, to declare martial law and suspend the...

Read more

Thaksin’s daughter takes Shinawatra brand to new Thai generation

byAFP
June 28, 2022, 12:00 am
0
155
Southwoods nails Seniors’ Fil golf crown

"Paetongtarn says she draws strength from her father’s ‘unwavering support’ and insists she will always be his ‘little girl’" By...

Read more

Covid-19 sets back poverty reduction

byManila Standard
June 27, 2022, 12:15 am
0
204
Covid-19 sets back poverty reduction

"The number of Filipinos in poverty has now risen to over 26 million, just under 25 percent of the population"...

Read more

A sustainable post-pandemic world

byOrlando Oxales
June 27, 2022, 12:10 am
0
224
Denying Villafuerte justice

"The string of yellow alerts because of unscheduled shutdowns of power plants, the runaway price hike of petroleum, the highest...

Read more
ADVERTISEMENT
Facebook Twitter Instagram Youtube

ABOUT US

Manila Standard

Manila Standard website (manilastandard.net), launched in August 2002, extends the newspaper’s reach beyond its traditional readers and makes its brand of Philippine news and opinion available to a much wider and geographically diverse readership here and overseas.

Digital Edition

In tone and content, the online edition mirrors the editorial thrust of the newspaper. While hewing to the traditional precepts of fairness and objectivity, MS believes the news of the day need not be staid, overly long or dry. Stories are succinct, readable and written in a lively style that has become a hallmark of the newspaper.

Download – Today’s Paper

Search

No Result
View All Result

6th Floor Universal Re Bldg., 106 Paseo De Roxas cor. Perea Street, Legaspi Village, 1226 Makati City Philippines

Trunklines: 832-5554, 832-5556, 832-5558

© 2021 Manila Standard - Designed and Developed by Neitiviti Studios.

No Result
View All Result
  • About
  • News
    • Top Stories
    • National
    • World News
    • Pinoy Abroad
    • Features
  • Opinion
    • Editorial
    • Columns
    • Soundbytes
  • LGUs
    • NCR
    • Luzon
    • Visayas
    • Mindanao
  • Business
    • Corporate
    • Economy & Trade
    • Stocks
    • Money
    • Agri & Mining
    • Power & Tech
    • IT & Telecom
  • Sports
    • Basketball
    • Volleyball
    • Fightsports
    • Active
    • Sports Plus
    • One Championship
    • Columns
  • Entertainment
    • TV & Movies
    • Celebrity Profiles
    • Music & Concerts
    • Digital Media
    • Columns
  • Lifestyle
    • Food
    • Culture & Media
    • Fashion
    • Health and Home
    • Leisure
    • Shopping
    • Columns
  • Pop.Life
    • Newsmakers
    • Hangouts
    • A-Pop
    • Post Its
    • Performances
    • Malls & Bazaars
    • Hobbies & Collections
  • Technology
    • Gadgets
    • Computers
    • Business
    • Tech Plus
  • MS ON THE ROAD
    • Sedan
    • SUV
    • Truck
    • Bike
    • Accessories
    • Motoring Plus
    • Commuter’s Corner
  • Home & Design
    • Residential
    • Commercial
    • Construction
    • Interior
  • Spotlight
  • Gallery
    • Photos
    • Videos
  • Events
    • Seminars
    • Exhibits
    • Community
  • Biyahero
    • Travel Features
    • Travel Reels
    • Travel Logs
  • Pets
  • Advertise with Us

© 2021 Manila Standard - Designed and Developed by Neitiviti Studios.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Install Manila Standard Web App

Install App