Advertisement

1-in-2 consumers would shun online service provider following data breach

Half of consumers (50%) would walk away from an online service provider if it suffered any form of data breach, according to a study of 15,000 consumers worldwide, conducted by global security company Kaspersky. 

The idea of avoidable data misuse is likely to incur even greater wrath from respondents, however, with 63% affirming they would no longer use the provider for fear of their data being sold to a third party in this case. As consumers understand more about businesses’ data privacy responsibilities, more transparency is needed from those companies about how they handle user data. 

Having to shop, be entertained, communicate and conduct business virtually is likely to have sparked heightened awareness about how much data is being offered, and what the upshots of this proliferation could be. Almost two-thirds (62%) of respondents are now worried that their online activities are being constantly tracked by the websites or services they visit. 

Not only would 50% of consumers stop using an online provider if they encountered a breach, but a vast portion are already demanding greater protection of their data ahead of time, from both enterprises and governments. Around half (51%) affirmed that they want companies to be transparent in their data processing, while 48% think companies should be equally open about how their technology works. A similar 50% called on governments to be transparent about their respective data collection and management processes.    

This isn’t to say that consumers are necessarily against the idea of data processing in general. 68% agree that the apps and digital services they use make their lives substantially easier. However, considering that more than one-in-10 (12%) have had their personal data leaked or shared inappropriately by a third party – leading to having secret information revealed (64%) or a loss of money (62%) – additional caution moving forward is understandable.

How should transparency be implemented by companies or organizations?

“It is clear from the data that people have developed a sense of control and they are now demanding openness about how and where their data is being managed. This is something we at Kaspersky absolutely support and champion, having brought to light the significance of transparency in the infosec space. We have recently relocated data processing to Switzerland, and this change of behavior among consumers will aid our own efforts to make data processing practices more secure and transparent in the future. Businesses should be aware of how detrimental it would be to brand reputation to ignore these calls,” says Marina Titova, Head of Consumer Product Marketing at Kaspersky. 

In addition to steps being taken by service providers, there are also measures that consumers can take to keep themselves and their information safe. Kaspersky’s recommendations include:

Updating programs and operating systems whenever prompted. Within these updates, vulnerabilities are patched which means that breaches are less likely to occur

Choosing an encrypted Wi-Fi connection to keep your computers and information safe from prying eyes. You can also employ a solution like Kaspersky Security Cloud, which offers a wide range of tools like account checker, private browsing, blocking modes, anti-ransomware, mobile security and password management

When you have to connect to public Wi-Fi, consider using a virtual private network (VPN). It protects your data and doesn’t keep your history of visited sites, search queries, or other actions, so you can remain protected from a potential breach

Changing account passwords regularly, as well as default passwords for your devices and router. Default passwords are too weak and already known across the internet

Finally, remaining vigilant to malicious, yet convincing emails and always being aware of privacy safeguards within all apps and services

Topics: Kaspersky , data breach , data misuse , virtual private network
COMMENT DISCLAIMER: Reader comments posted on this Web site are not in any way endorsed by Manila Standard. Comments are views by manilastandard.net readers who exercise their right to free expression and they do not necessarily represent or reflect the position or viewpoint of manilastandard.net. While reserving this publication’s right to delete comments that are deemed offensive, indecent or inconsistent with Manila Standard editorial standards, Manila Standard may not be held liable for any false information posted by readers in this comments section.
AdvertisementGMA-Congress Trivia 1
Advertisement