The petition for indirect contempt filed by former Maguindanao Gov. Datu Andal Ampatuan, Jr. against ABS-CBN Corp. and former reporter Jorge Cariño has been dismissed.
In a decision dated April 25, 2023, but only recently made public, the Supreme Court (SC) en banc granted the petition for review on certiorari of ABS-CBN and also reversed and set aside the decision of the Court of Appeals that affirmed the Regional Trial Court’s refusal to dismiss the indirect contempt petition of Ampatuan, ABS-CBN News reported.
In 2010, reports said Cariño interviewed Lakmodin Saliao who narrated on TV Patrol that he was present when the Ampatuan family planned the 2009 Maguindanao massacre.
The interview prompted Ampatuan’s petition before the RTC to cite Saliao, ABS-CBN, and Cariño for indirect contempt claiming that Saliao’s interview was meant to interfere with court proceedings to serve Saliao’s own interest, ABS-CBN News further reported.
The SC cautioned in its decision that given the drastic and extraordinary nature of its contempt powers, its exercise must be restrained and judicious.
“Our power to punish for contempt should never be wielded to stifle comments on public interest,” the SC said in the decision.
The SC said the contempt petition must be dismissed for failing to show the following facts: that public statements were made regarding the merits of the case pending before courts; the mental element of the speaker showing that the purpose of the speech is to impede the administration of justice; the clear and present danger of the utterance to the administration of justice; and the effect of the speech on the court’s independence and public confidence in the judiciary.
Amaptuan’s petition failed to state the second and third requirements, according to the SC.
“Those accused of indirect contempt should not be compelled to proceed to trial when the charges are grossly insufficient,” the court said.
The SC however added that while ABS-CBN and Cariño were correct that Saliao’s statements were matters of grave public concern, they should not have presented Saliao as a witness on national television.
“The use of the term ‘testigo’ in Saliao’s presentation to the public removes the distinction between media interviews and witness presentations in open court,” the court said.
The SC also discussed in the decision how contemptuous speech can now be said online, warning the courts on the importance of social media posts to the court’s administration of justice.