Flawed affidavit keeps ex-minister from testifying

Expelled minister of the Iglesia Ni Cristo Lowell Menorca II on Tuesday failed to testify before the Court of Appeals in connection with his case against INC leaders.     

At the continuation of the hearing on his habeas corpus and amparo   petition, Menorca was supposed to take the witness stand to narrate his allegations of abduction, harassment and illegal detention against the top INC ministers.   

But before he could start his testimony, lawyers of the respondents urged the CA’s   Seventh Division to   suspend their cross examination of Menorca due to flaws and   questionable entries in his 53-page judicial affidavit.   

INC lawyer Patricia-Ann Prodigalidad informed the appellate court they have found   at least 117 objections in the affidavit submitted by Menorca’s   lawyers ahead of the hearing. 

Prodigalidad argued that the statements submitted were hearsay, speculations and opinions, citing the court’s judicial affidavit rule that requires   the affidavit to contain only facts and particulars in a question-and-answer format.

The lawyer cited for instance the claim of Menorca in lines 15 to18 of the Question 3 in his affidavit that he was “forcibly taken upon orders of the INC.”

She likened this conclusion drawn by Menorca to a telenovela or soap opera since it was not supported by evidence. She sought the deletion of this portion of the affidavit.

The justices approved the deletion, saying Menorca “has no authority   and personal knowledge” over such claim.

The INC lawyer said they have similar questions to more than a hundred   more portions of Menorca’s affidavit.    

Prodigalidad stressed that they do not intend to delay the proceedings, recalling that they did not raise similar questions to   testimonies of witnesses of Menorca during earlier hearing last November 11 and 12.

INC lawyers cited inconsistencies in the testimonies of Menorca’s wife Jinky, brother Anthony and nanny Abegail Yanson in   demonstrating the weaknesses of the case.

The appellate court then ordered Prodigalidad to put in writing her objections and Menorca’s counsel to also submit answer before the court resolves the   questions.  The court also set the next hearing on   January 20   next year.




Topics: Igesia ni Cristo , Lowell Menorca II
COMMENT DISCLAIMER: Reader comments posted on this Web site are not in any way endorsed by Manila Standard. Comments are views by readers who exercise their right to free expression and they do not necessarily represent or reflect the position or viewpoint of While reserving this publication’s right to delete comments that are deemed offensive, indecent or inconsistent with Manila Standard editorial standards, Manila Standard may not be held liable for any false information posted by readers in this comments section.
AdvertisementGMA-Congress Trivia 1