Consumer group files case against ERC commissioners

posted July 10, 2017 at 08:32 pm
by  Othel V. Campos
Non-government group Laban Konsyumer Inc. filed criminal and administrative cases against the commissioners of the Energy Regulatory Commission before the Office of the Ombudsman for the agency’s alleged failure to promote consumer interest.

Laban Konsyumer president Vic Dimagiba, a former Trade undersecretary, accused the ERC commissioners of violating the Corrupt Practices Act, the Code of Ethics of Government Officers and the Revised Penal Code. 

Laban Konsyumer accused the commissioners of allegedly violating the Code of Conduct governing public officials and gross inexcusable negligence when they allowed Manila Electric Co. to collect P1.7 billion in March, April and May 2017 from Meralco consumers.  

The incremental fuel cost in over three months resulted in the increase of P0.2211 per kilowatt hour of electricity consumed in March, April and May 2017. 

The consumer group filed the original complaint on March 30, 2017 but later executed a supplemental affidavit complaint to include administrative liability.

The Ombudsman will now proceed with the preliminary investigation of the criminal case and the adjudication of the administrative case.

The respondents were ERC chairman Jose Vicente Salazar and commissioners Josefina Patricia Magpale -Asirit, Gloria VictoriaYap- Taruc and Geronimo Sta. Ana.  Salazar, however, is already under preventive suspension as ordered by the Office of the President over a separate issue.

The consumers’ group challenged an ERC order dated March 6, 2017 when it granted provisional authority in favor of Meralco using the force majeure  provisions of the Meralco power supply contracts where force majeure is defined as  all forms of fuel supply interruptions .

The commissioners  determined   an announced and  scheduled preventive maintenance shutdown  as force majeure  and  allowed  Meralco  to   pass  on all added costs of fuels  to the consumers, instead of ordering these added costs to  be absorbed by  the  natural gas supplier.

Topics: Laban Konsyumer Inc. , criminal and administrative cases , Energy Regulatory Commission , ERC commissioners
COMMENT DISCLAIMER: Reader comments posted on this Web site are not in any way endorsed by The Standard. Comments are views by readers who exercise their right to free expression and they do not necessarily represent or reflect the position or viewpoint of While reserving this publication’s right to delete comments that are deemed offensive, indecent or inconsistent with The Standard editorial standards, The Standard may not be held liable for any false information posted by readers in this comments section.