Advertisement

Report exposes meddling of lobby group in PH

Consumer groups in the Philippines asked the government to immediately cut ties with Bloomberg Philanthropies following an expose of a US-based think tank about the group’s repeated meddling in the affairs of low and middle-income countries, including the Philippines.

The Nicotine Consumers Union of the Philippines and the Philippine E-cigarette Industry Association said the revelation made by Competitive Enterprise Institute about the intrusion of Bloomberg Philanthropies in the Philippines and other countries should serve as a wake-up call to the government.

Documents leaked to CEI described how Bloomberg’s Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids influenced anti-tobacco policies around the world. In a blog titled “Exposed: Bloomberg’s Anti-Tobacco Meddling in Developing Countries” and posted on the website of CEI, Michelle Minton disclosed the content of the 128-page document of CTFK 2017 strategy for LMICs. CTFK is funded by Bloomberg Philanthropies, the charity of financial billionaire Michael Bloomberg.

Minton said the leaked internal communications from CTFK “show the true extent of its influence, which reaches throughout all levels of civil society, media and even government, and appears aimed at imposing its will on the developing world, regardless of the needs and interests of the people who live there. Worse, it often provides funding to foreign government entities, seemingly without much regard for those governments’ level of respect for liberal values and democratic governance,” Minton said.

The documents cited specific cases of how Bloomberg and CTFK pushed anti-tobacco strategies in LMICs. In the Philippines, for example, the CTFK documents describe efforts “to file and push a smoke-free bill” aimed at blocking tobacco industry representatives from being part of the policy process, further noting that such a bill “has been drafted and will be filed as soon as the opportunity is ripe.”

“Taking advantage of the favorable political environment, we will promote the implementation of the EO after it is signed by the President. We will also prepare to file and push a smoke-free bill to amend the smoke-free provisions of RA 9211 and preventing the tobacco industry from being a part of government efforts to implement the policy. We will start advocating for higher tobacco taxes,” the leaked document read in part, detailing CTFK’s specific intent.

The House of Representatives recently concluded an investigation to determine whether the Philippine Food and Drug Administration issued specific and pre-defined policies on e-cigarettes and HTPs in exchange for funding from The Union, which is funded by the anti-tobacco organization Bloomberg Initiative.

Puwersa ng Bayaning Atleta Party List Representative Jericho Nograles revealed that several government agencies, including the FDA, Department of Health, Civil Service Commissioner, Metro Manila Development Authority, received a total of $2.5 million from The Union since 2009.

“There have been multiple instances wherein every time there is an anti-tobacco regulation that comes out of either the FDA or DOH, it coincides with grants coming from Bloomberg,” Nograles said.

One issuance in question is the controversial Joint Memorandum Circular 2010-01 by the DOH and the CSC, which was cited as the basis for a draft regulation barring tobacco companies and other industries access to COVID-19 vaccine through the government’s tripartite agreement. The same circular was also cited as basis in refusing acceptance of the much-needed respirators donated by the tobacco industry.

The JMC was signed by then-CSC chief and now DOH Secretary Francisco Duque III prohibiting government interaction with the tobacco industry.

No less than CSC Commissioner Aileen Lourdes Lizada had moved to recall what she described as a “defective” JMC. She noted that there was no record in the CSC that granted Duque authority to sign the JMC on behalf of the CSC which acts as a collegial body.

During a Senate hearing on National COVID-19 Vaccination Program, Senate Minority Leader Franklin Drilon questioned Duque about the JMC and asked to have it reviewed by the Department of Justice.

Referring to the refusal of the donated respirators, Drilon told Duque that, “There is absolutely no basis for you to take this action. It is an overreach on the part of the DOH to reject such a donation simply because it came from a tobacco company. I do hope that this JMC is submitted and reviewed by DOJ.”

Reacting to Minton’s expose’, NCUP president Anton Israel said the document proved that “Bloomberg Philanthropies and the many organizations it is supporting have been funding government agencies in the country in exchange of anti-tobacco and anti-vaping policies and are depriving the rights of 16 million Filipino smokers and 1 million users of smoke-free nicotine products.”

“Worse, they make it appear that it is okay to influence national policies. But this meddling recently backfired when the Department of Health, in its eagerness to enforce Bloomberg’s policies, refused to use the life-saving respirators donated by tobacco companies at the height of the health crisis,” Israel said.

PECIA president Joey Dulay said that instead of relying on the advice of foreign NGOs, the government should listen to Filipino consumers who are directly affected by these policies.

The document, provided by an anonymous source to CEI, described how CTFK, one of the main outfits through which Bloomberg channels anti-tobacco money, influence policies in developing regions. CEI is a think tank fighting barriers to freedom, innovation, and prosperity.

“CTFK has endeavored to influence all levels of the political process and its key players in various countries. This includes partnerships and collaborations (often financial) with activists, think tanks, professional associations, media, universities, and governments. At the top, CTFK decides the priorities and the best course of action, while its grantees, sub-grantees, and ‘partners’ aid the effort by promulgating public endorsements, media coverage, supportive evidence, regulations, legislation, and discrediting of detractors,” Minton said.

“Viewed as a whole, however, the strategy of CTFK and the wider Bloomberg-funded anti-tobacco effort appears aimed at winning policy battles and passing laws with little consideration of whether they result in actual reductions in smoking or improvements in health,” Minton said.

Minton noted that in Turkey, a country cited as a success story for implementing all of the WHO’s tobacco policies, which CTFK advocates for around the world, adult smoking rates actually increased from 27 percent to over 31 percent between 2012 and 2018.

Minton said while there is evidence that alternative approaches work better for certain populations, these are vehemently rejected by the Bloomberg-funded anti-tobacco movement, who consistently ignore the successes of countries like Japan, where cigarette sales have dropped over 40 percent thanks to people switching to heat-not-burn tobacco products, and Sweden, which enjoys the lowest rates of smoking and lung cancer in the European Union as a result of its embrace of the use of non-combustible snus.

“Despite all this, CTFK and its allies in the global tobacco control movement continue to advocate for policies that have been shown to consistently backfire, without any apparent effort to course correct. More troublingly, perhaps, they also appear uninterested in how their approach to influencing LMICs may be harmful to the long-term welfare of the people who live there,” Minton said.

“The strategy may be effective for manipulating LMICs into adopting the tobacco policies Bloomberg and CTFK favor, but it may also be perpetuating or exacerbating the legacy of colonialism in the developing world,” said Minton.

Topics: Bloomberg Philanthropies , Nicotine Consumers Union of the Philippines , Philippine E-cigarette Industry Association , CTFK 2017
COMMENT DISCLAIMER: Reader comments posted on this Web site are not in any way endorsed by Manila Standard. Comments are views by manilastandard.net readers who exercise their right to free expression and they do not necessarily represent or reflect the position or viewpoint of manilastandard.net. While reserving this publication’s right to delete comments that are deemed offensive, indecent or inconsistent with Manila Standard editorial standards, Manila Standard may not be held liable for any false information posted by readers in this comments section.
AdvertisementKPPI
Advertisement