By Jean-Baptiste Oubrier
London, United Kingdom—Brexiteers have long argued that leaving the European Union, with or without a trade deal, would herald Britain’s so-called sunlit uplands of economic prosperity.
But the outlook remains uncertain, as the economy struggles to recover from a recession sparked by the coronavirus outbreak.
Despite eye-wateringly costly emergency state interventions, including the subsidy of private-sector wages, a bounce back does not look to be on the cards for months, if not years.
Britain will nevertheless embark upon life outside its main trading partner on January 1, 2021, leaving the EU single market and customs union that benefitted “UK plc” for decades.
The nation officially left the EU in January but is currently locked in a Brexit transition period that means the bloc’s rules still apply until December 31.
Many analysts predict Brexit will unleash even more painful economic damage, delivering another hammer blow just as the COVID-19 fallout begins to ease with the advent of vaccines.
Just how much harm it will do hinges on the outcome of fractious trade talks between Brussels and the government of Britain’s pro-Brexit Conservative Prime Minister Boris Johnson, which have gone down to the wire.
‘Inevitable disruption’
Capital Economics analyst Thomas Pugh says there will inevitably be disruption but predicts it might not be long lasting.
“If there were a deal it would probably mean no tariffs or quotas on goods, and trade in services would probably remain similar to how it is now,” Pugh said in a research note, also sounding optimism over a possible deal for key financial services.
In the absence of an agreement, Britain will revert to World Trade Organization rules which would see tariffs imposed on a wide range or products, from car parts to beef.
UK companies would face an overnight spike in their costs—which they are expected to pass on to consumers in the form of higher prices, particularly for imported fresh food products.
“There would be some inevitable disruption as firms get used to the new rules—there will be ‘rules of origin’ checks for the first time in many years,” predicted Pugh.
“But the period of disruption should be relatively short-lived.”
At the same time, even a Brexit trade deal would not be as advantageous as being part of the EU’s single market, which ensures a smooth flow of trade across the continent.
The Bank of England has forecast that slumping exports and supply-chain disruption arising from no-deal could send the UK economy shrinking by 1.0 percent in the first quarter of 2021.
The highly-respected London School of Economics has predicted that a no-deal Brexit—with reimposed customs duties and border controls—could wreak more economic havoc than coronavirus because of the longer-term consequences.
And official UK documents, dating from the previous Conservative government, estimated no-deal would slash British gross domestic product by 7.6 percent over a 15-year period.
The documents, unveiled in late 2018, also suggested that GDP would still be diminished by 4.9 percent—even in the event of a trade deal.
Although a free-trade agreement would eliminate or sharply cut customs duties, it does not remove all red tape or border controls.
Britain is therefore pressing ahead with the construction of giant lorry parks in Kent, southeast England, as it looks to prevent gridlock on the roads in and out of London.