By Su Xinqi
The trial of 47 of Hong Kong’s most prominent pro-democracy figures begins Monday, in the largest prosecution under a national security law that has crushed dissent in the city.
The proceedings are expected to last more than four months, and the defendants face up to life imprisonment if convicted.
Those on trial represent a cross-section of Hong Kong’s opposition — including legal scholar Benny Tai, former lawmakers Claudia Mo, Au Nok-hin and Leung Kwok-hung, and democracy activists Joshua Wong and Lester Shum.
They are charged with “conspiracy to commit subversion” for organising an unofficial primary election.
According to authorities, they were trying to topple Hong Kong’s government, while the defendants say they are being prosecuted for practising normal opposition politics.
Their stated aim was to win a majority in the city’s partially elected legislature, which would allow them to veto budgets and potentially force the resignation of Hong Kong’s leader.
That vote was ultimately scrapped and Beijing installed a new political system that strictly vets who can stand for office.
The 47 were charged en masse under the national security law that China imposed in 2020, after huge and often violent pro-democracy protests.
Beijing says the law was needed to curb unrest, but critics say the crackdown on the opposition has eviscerated the city’s autonomy and political freedoms.
Fair or farce?
Dennis Kwok, a former opposition lawmaker who now lives in the United States, described the trial as “a complete farce”.
“Subversion is a crime that used to require someone who threatened to use violence… to overturn the regime,” Kwok told AFP.
“It doesn’t include people who simply run for office and pledge to use their public office to force the government to respond to the demands of the people they represent.”
Prosecutors and government supporters see the unofficial primary differently.
“I would assume if your intent is to bring down the government, then that must be unlawful,” said Ronny Tong, a veteran lawyer.
A city transformed
While Hong Kong has never been a democracy, it enjoyed far more freedoms than mainland China.
The national security law has transformed the city’s political landscape as well as its common law legal traditions, refashioning Hong Kong’s courts to more closely resemble the mainland’s.
The law also empowered China’s security apparatus to operate openly in the city.
Judges who sit on national security cases are handpicked by the city’s leader and there has not yet been a trial in front of a jury.
Most of the defendants in this case — 34 out of 47 — have been jailed for almost two years. The few granted bail have to abide by strict conditions, including speech restrictions.
Legal and political analysts are watching the trial closely.
Eric Lai, at Georgetown University’s Center for Asian Law, said Hong Kongers will be paying attention to “how the prosecution defines an ordinary civil society event as a criminal act”.
Sixteen of the 47 have pleaded not guilty.
At least three will testify against their peers as prosecution witnesses, the court has been told.
