spot_img
29.7 C
Philippines
Sunday, May 5, 2024

The $1,500 sandwich

- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -

By Eric Jurado

“FREE trade consists simply in letting people buy and sell as they want to buy and sell. Protective tariffs are as much an application of force as are blocking squadrons, and their objective is the same—to prevent trade. The difference between the two is that blocking squadrons are a means whereby nations seek to prevent their enemies from trading; protective tariffs are a means whereby nations attempt to prevent their own people from trading.” —Henry George, 19th century political economist

What would life be like without exchange or trade?

Recently, a man decided to make a sandwich from scratch. He grew the vegetables, gathered salt from seawater, milked a cow, turned the milk into cheese, pickled a cucumber in a jar, ground his own flour from wheat to make the bread, collected his own honey, and personally killed a chicken for its meat. He published the results of his endeavor in an enlightening video: Making a sandwich entirely by himself cost him six months of his life and set him back $1,500 or P78,000 (It should be noted that he used air transportation to get to the ocean to gather salt. If he had taken it upon himself to learn to build and fly a plane, then his endeavor would have proved impossible).

The inefficiency of making even something as humble as a sandwich by oneself, without the benefits of market exchange, is simply mind-boggling. There was a time when everyone grew their own food and made their own clothes. It was a time of unimaginable poverty and labor without rest.

- Advertisement -

The greater the number of people involved in exchange, the more beneficial the process becomes. As I write this, thanks to international trade, I am drinking coffee grown in Latin America, viewing a computer screen with eyeglasses made in Europe, and typing this article on a keyboard made in Asia. Fortunately, freedom to trade internationally has improved, on average, around the world. Increased trade has helped raise living standards and decrease global poverty.

However, the United States’ trade war with China and its effect on the rest of the world is less positive. If trade protectionist politicians, like Bernie Sanders on the left and Donald Trump on the right, continue to have their way, then the freedom to trade internationally may deteriorate further. They put down trade by claiming that it harms the economy and destroys jobs. Yet, there is a widespread agreement among economists that free trade is key to prosperity.

This morning, as you drink your coffee, take a moment to consider where it comes from. You probably would not be drinking it right now if it were not for trade. The sandwich-from-scratch video elegantly draws attention to the myriad ways in which the exchange of goods and services across national borders touches lives and helps raise living standards. Almost everything you use is the product of a complex web of human cooperation, often extending beyond your country. Even something as simple as a bag of groceries or a pencil is the end result of a “symphony of human activity that spans the globe.”

Countries that impose obstacles to exchange—either domestic or international—reduce the ability of their citizens to achieve gains from trade and to live more prosperous lives.

Eric Jurado writes about the values of personal and economic freedom, and their importance in advancing peace, prosperity, and human progress.

- Advertisement -

LATEST NEWS

Popular Articles