Friday, May 15, 2026
Today's Print

Why autism reform cannot wait anymore

“The Philippines cannot continue pretending that autism is a private family matter. It is a national development issue”

(Editor’s Note: In the first half of this piece, the writer makes the case for the passage of Senate Bill 1822, or the proposed National Autism Care, Support, and Inclusion Act, into law. This part highlights the salient points of the bill and argues that autism ultimately is a national development issue.)

The bill integrates early screening and diagnosis into primary healthcare and maternal-child health systems, which is precisely where intervention should begin.

- Advertisement -

It mandates stronger referral networks and evidence-based healthcare services nationwide. It requires the government to strengthen the autism workforce through training, certification, and equitable deployment of specialists.

Equally important, it requires the Philippine Health Insurance Corp. (PhilHealth) to provide coverage for ASD-related services, including diagnosis, therapy, and rehabilitation.

That provision alone could substantially alter the financial reality of thousands of Filipino households. Therapy for children with autism can cost families tens of thousands of pesos each month.

For middle-class families, it can mean draining savings and taking on debt. For poor families, it often means receiving no intervention at all.

The bill also addresses education and employment, two areas where Filipinos with ASD continue to face exclusion disguised as inconvenience. Inclusive education remains inconsistent across schools, while workplace accommodations are still treated as optional favors rather than basic obligations.

By establishing clearer pathways for inclusive learning, skills development, and employment support, the measure recognizes that persons with autism are citizens capable of contributing meaningfully to society when given adequate support.

Critics will inevitably ask how much implementation will cost. The more appropriate question is how much the country is already losing by doing nothing.

Every parent forced to leave the workforce represents lost productivity. Every child denied early intervention represents higher long-term social and healthcare costs. Every adult with autism excluded from employment represents wasted human potential in an economy already struggling with labor participation and skills gaps.

The Philippines cannot continue pretending that autism is a private family matter. It is a national development issue.

What makes the debate over this bill different is that lawmakers finally began speaking honestly about those realities.

Sen. Joel Villanueva, one of the bill’s co-authors and co-sponsors, spoke not only as a legislator but as a father of a child with special needs. He described the sacrifices his family endured navigating systems that were never designed for children like his son.

That testimony mattered because it reflected what countless Filipino parents already know: the country’s autism crisis is not theoretical.

It unfolds every day in homes where mothers leave careers permanently, fathers work multiple jobs to pay therapy bills, and children wait months or years for services that should have been accessible from the start.

For too long, government response to autism has relied on symbolic gestures rather than structural reform. Awareness campaigns are easier than building specialist networks. Public statements are cheaper than funding intervention programs. Sympathy costs less than policy.

But families cannot pay therapy bills with awareness slogans.

The National Autism Care, Support, and Inclusion Act is not perfect. No law is. Its success will depend heavily on implementation, funding consistency, and agency coordination.

But it represents a long-overdue recognition that autism policy cannot remain fragmented, underfunded, and optional.

More importantly, it acknowledges something the Philippine government has avoided confronting for years: when the state fails to build systems for autism care and inclusion, the costs do not disappear.

They are merely transferred to families until those families collapse under the weight.

The Senate has already acted. The House of Representatives and the executive branch should move with equal urgency.

The country can no longer afford to treat autism as someone else’s private burden. The bill should become law as soon as possible, not as an act of charity, but as an overdue investment in millions of Filipino lives and in the future productivity, dignity, and stability of the nation itself.

(Jimbo Owen Gulle is the former News Editor of Manila Standard, where he started his journalistic career as a sportswriter over three decades ago. He continues to contribute articles to the Standard and other publications while working as a freelance editor and media consultant.)

- Advertisement -

Leave a review

RECENT STORIES

spot_imgspot_imgspot_imgspot_img
spot_img
spot_imgspot_imgspot_img
Popular Categories
- Advertisement -spot_img