A regional trial court junked the case against the chief executive of a sanitary landfill operator in Bataan for alleged dumping of hazardous and liquid wastes under Section 13 of RA 6969 or “An Act to Control to Control Toxic Substances and Hazardous and Nuclear Wastes”
The case was filed by the local government unit of Hermosa, Bataan, represented by its newly appointed municipal and environmental and natural resources officer.
In granting the Demurrer to Evidence filed by the camp of the Atty. Beulah Coeli Fiel, president and CEO of Econest Waste Management Corp, Judge Amelita Cruz Corpuz of the Regional Trial Court Branch 96 Dinalupihan, Bataan dismissed the case due to insufficiency of evidence.
The court said, “There was no testimonial or documentary evidence presented that will prove beyond reasonable doubt that herein accused committed the act complained of,” and “that the evidence of the prosecution is insufficient, hence, dismissal of this case is proper under the premises.”
Prosecution witness Ronel Pagcaliwangan, COO of Udenna Environmental Services, while admitting that they did business with Econest, nonetheless denied disposing of any untreated hazardous wastes at the Hermosa landfill.
Court order also noted Pagcaliwangan’s letter dated February 26, 2020, wherein he wrote, “There was no instance where we disposed of any liquid chemical wastes in your sanitary landfill, as these were either treated via our Physico-Chemical Treatment Facility in Taguig or Thermal Oxidation in our Bataan Plant”.
The order also highlighted that the complainant Hermosa MENRO Jesus De Luna admitted that the two Notices of Violation against Econest dated September 19, 2019 and February 11, 2020, respectively, attached to the complaint show nothing about hazardous wastes.
De Luna was appointed Hermosa Menro just in October 2020. Prior to his appointment, he was an employee of Limay LGU detailed to Hermosa LGU, the order stated. This was after the landfill was ordered closed by the Hermosa LGU in February that same year.
Amethya dela Llana, head of the Ecology Department of the Subic Bay Metropolitan Authority, who also testified for the prosecution that some locators inside the Subic Bay Freeport Zone had disposed of wastes at the Hermosa Sanitary Landfill, clarified on cross-examination that none of the wastes listed in the certification that she issued could be classified as hazardous or toxic under RA 6969.
Prosecution witness Elvis Atendido, Hermosa LGU garbage trucks supervisor, narrated that garbage truck driver, Jorry Villanueva, also a witness, reported to him about the unpleasant smell in the landfill.
In his testimony, Atendido said that he immediately went to the landfill and stopped ten meters away from a jumbo sack because of the “nakakasulasok na amoy”.
The court order noted that Atendido admitted not opening the jumbo sack and not knowing what it contained.
Atendido also admitted to having no expertise in identifying toxic or hazardous wastes, but merely ground his testimony on said alleged foul odor, which he could not differentiate from regular municipal waste.
Two former employees of Econest, Aljon Puzon and Jaime Baltazar, testified that they allegedly witnessed toxic wastes being dumped at the landfill, but were unable to provide proof thereof such as videos or photographs, and could not ascertain who gave the directive from the top management of Econest.
The court ordered the release of Fiel’s cash bond amounting to P120, 000.
In a statement, Fiel said she was relieved and deeply grateful for the dismissal of “these trumped up charges”
“I hope that this will now put the issue to rest and help me regain my tarnished reputation. We had 74 regular and informal workers who depended their livelihood on that SLF. That is translated into 74 familes who were left hungry and poor especially during the economic crisis brought about by the Covid-19 pandemic,” Atty. Fiel added.
Hermosa LGU and Econest entered into public-private partnership agreement for the operation of the Hermosa Sanitary Landfill but the former unceremoniously closed the same without the support of any final finding from the Environmental Management Bureau. Neither did the EMB participate in prosecuting the case against lawyer Fiel.
