Lorenzana says China’s planned ADIZ on WPS ‘illegal’

posted June 25, 2020 at 11:10 pm
by  Manila Standard
Department of National Defense Secretary Delfin Lorenzana on Thursday concurred with the warning of a ranking United States military official saying the air defense identification zone  planned by China in the South China Sea “goes against rules-based order.”

“Yes, I agree. First, an ADIZ by China over the entire South China Sea would arrogate unto itself a vast sea considered to be a global commons that has been opened for millennia to all for navigation and fishing,” Lorenzana said in a media statement.

US Pacific Air Forces commander, Gen. Charles Brown earlier said such a move from Beijing would impact not only the United States but all nations in the region.

“Second, it violates the exclusive economic rights of littoral states over their EEZs (exclusive economic zones) under the UNCLOS (United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea) of which China was a signatory. Third, a lot of countries will treat this ADIZ as illegal and violative of international laws,” Lorenzana said.

The UNCLOS provides a framework for the governance of the oceans.

Should the ADIZ be put in place, this would further raise tensions in the region and could trigger miscalculations at sea and in the area, he added.

 “It is my fervent hope that China would not proceed with this planned action for the continued peace and stability in the entire South China Sea,” Lorenzana said.

Topics: Department of National Defense , Delfin Lorenzana , South China Sea , West Philippine Sea , exclusive economic zones , United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea , air defense identification zone
COMMENT DISCLAIMER: Reader comments posted on this Web site are not in any way endorsed by The Standard. Comments are views by thestandard.ph readers who exercise their right to free expression and they do not necessarily represent or reflect the position or viewpoint of thestandard.ph. While reserving this publication’s right to delete comments that are deemed offensive, indecent or inconsistent with The Standard editorial standards, The Standard may not be held liable for any false information posted by readers in this comments section.