Beirut Bar Association chief Melhem Khalaf called on a judge investigating an explosion at the Lebanese capital's port to also enquire into a "worrying" port blaze that could have compromised evidence.
Security agencies are looking into what caused the huge fire that broke out on Thursday at the port, the site of a massive blast on August 4 that killed at least 190 people and ravaged swathes of the city.
Last week's blaze, which torched a warehouse containing vital food aid, caused a storm of speculation on social media from experts and activists over the possibility that it was sparked deliberately to tamper with evidence at the explosion site.
A probe into the blast was launched by Lebanese authorities in the wake of the disaster caused by the explosion of tonnes of ammonium nitrate left for years at the port, of which officials had long been aware.
Judge Fadi Sawan, who is leading the Beirut blast probe, dismissed the possibility that the fire was set to destroy evidence because it occurred outside an area designated by the judiciary as the zone of investigations into the explosion, a judicial source told AFP.
But Khalaf said he was still alarmed by the incident, especially as Thursday's blaze came only two days after a smaller fire had broken out at the port.
"Preserving the (blast) crime scene was the first thing we asked" of the probe, Khalaf told AFP on Monday.
"Investigative judge (Sawan) should take over and carry on with investigations because... what happened is unacceptable and worrying."
The cause of last week's massive fire remains unclear, but outgoing minister of public works and transport, Michel Najjar, has said that welding works could have sparked the blaze in the port's duty free zone.
A security official told AFP that investigators were also considering the possibility Thursday's port fire was sparked deliberately as part of an insurance fraud scheme, but they have yet to find any evidence.
A judicial source said investigators have yet to establish a link between the port fire and the August 4 explosion and are treating the two cases separately.
But forensic expert Omar Nashabe said last week's fire should not be dismissed as irrelevant to blast investigations.
Sawan should not overlook the "hypothesis that the cases are linked", he told AFP, calling the timing and setting of last week's fire "suspicious".
"The similarities in the two incidents... requires that judge Fadi Sawan links the two cases together," he added.
COMMENT DISCLAIMER: Reader comments posted on this Web site are not in any way endorsed by Manila Standard. Comments are views by manilastandard.net readers who exercise their right to free expression and they do not necessarily represent or reflect the position or viewpoint of manilastandard.net. While reserving this publication’s right to delete comments that are deemed offensive, indecent or inconsistent with Manila Standard editorial standards, Manila Standard may not be held liable for any false information posted by readers in this comments section.