Crop agency takeover not fair to farmers — Bongbong

posted September 22, 2021 at 11:40 pm
by  Manila Standard
Taking the cudgels for farmers, former Senator Ferdinand “Bongbong” Marcos Jr. questioned the takeover of the Philippine Crop Insurance Corp. (PCIC) from the Department of Agriculture (DA) by the Department of Finance (DOF).

“Bakit kailangang itransfer sa DoF… eh, ang DA ang mas nakaaalam sa mga kaganapan sa agricultural sector? Nasa DA ang lahat ng pertinent data tungkol sa naturang sector. ‘Di ba ang PCIC was formed to provide insurance protection to farmers against losses arising from natural disasters, plant diseases, and pest infestation?” he pointed out.

The former lawmaker noted that farmers, through the Federation of Free Farmers, have expressed apprehension that under the DoF, the PCIC’s priority will shift to fiscal and monetary concerns which may not necessarily be supportive of the needs of farmers and the DA.

“Dapat ikonsidera rin ang agam-agam ng ating mga magsasaka dahil sila ang sektor na apektado dito sa paglipat na ito. Dapat ay kinunsulta sila,” Marcos said, adding that the lack of consultation was one of the sentiments that farmers raised.

Marcos said there is a need to review Executive Order No. 148 which transferred the PCIC to the DoF for “policy and program coordination, and general supervision,” allegedly in a bid to ensure that government assets and resources are used effectively.

The Finance Department on Sunday announced that it is no longer keen on privatizing the crop insurance firm but is mulling over involving the private sector for reinsurance.

It added that involving the private sector in reinsurance would bode well for farmers because re-insurance will most likely allow the expansion of coverage to more farmers and more crops and livestock. 

Topics: Ferdinand “Bongbong” Marcos Jr. , Philippine Crop Insurance Corp. , Department of Agriculture , Department of Finance
COMMENT DISCLAIMER: Reader comments posted on this Web site are not in any way endorsed by The Standard. Comments are views by readers who exercise their right to free expression and they do not necessarily represent or reflect the position or viewpoint of While reserving this publication’s right to delete comments that are deemed offensive, indecent or inconsistent with The Standard editorial standards, The Standard may not be held liable for any false information posted by readers in this comments section.