Islands for Sale: A statement from scrap

posted April 15, 2021 at 07:30 pm
By Neil Doloricon

The history of the Philippines is marked with trade-offs with colonizers and the big imperial powers like the US. 

The Pact of Biak-na-Bato, for instance, was an agreement between colonial Spanish Governor-General Primo de Rivera and Gen. Emilio Aguinaldo, who represented the Filipino revolutionaries, for a negotiated surrender of the revolutionaries in exchange for amnesty and a monetary indemnity of P400,000 in December of 1897. 

In 1898, after Aguinaldo was hoodwinked by American officials into thinking that they were not interested in the Philippine Islands, there came the Treaty of Paris under which the US bought the country from Spain for $20 million. It officially ended the Spanish-American War, but then led to the Philippine-American War. 

SINKING OR FLOATING. Pete Jimenez mounts ‘Islands for Sale,’ an exhibit at the Ateneo Art Gallery featuring decommissioned boats of the Philippine Navy cut into halves to look like submerged boats or floating islands. 
During “the bloody blundering business” — as one documentary film described the Philippine-American War — Filipinos suffered from the killing spree of American soldiers trying to keep their hold on their newfound colony. 

In contemporary times, artist Pete Jimenez made a remarkable artistic statement by describing his installation works as “Islands for Sale.” These are 1960s boats made from decommissioned rescue boats of the Philippine Navy — outworn, dysfunctional vessels from the military point of view that were supposed to be disposed of in a junkyard. Mind you, these were donations from the US, which, in many cases, the American military already considered as junk. But they gave them away to allies like the Philippines as part of the Mutual Defense Pact. 

Jimenez describes these boats with metaphorical passion as islands, their usefulness expired mainly due to obsolescence. 

Jimenez, who is a very resourceful artist, cut the eight boats into halves, placing some of them right side up and some upside down. They look like submerged boats, giving you the feeling of seeing the aftermath of a war, where things are scattered all over. At the same time, you can think of them as representing the contested Spratly Islands floating in the sea. 

China, the emerging power, has been friendly to some Philippine presidents, like Gloria Arroyo and Rodrigo Duterte. Arroyo has been accused of selling out to Chinese officials through the ZTE deal, which became a big scandal during her presidency. Among others, she was also accused of conspiring with Chinese officials to go on a joint exploration of contested islands in the West Philippine Sea, despite these being in our exclusive economic zone. But public opinion against this fell on Arroyo’s deaf ears.

Despite winning the case against Chinese intrusion into our exclusive economic zone during the time of President Noynoy Aquino, the Philippines now faces a China that has been working secretly on putting up their military installations on our islands. This has caused public alarm as the intrusion has come closer to home.

President Duterte compounded the problem by being too cautious about not provoking the Chinese government into taking an adversarial stance, fearing that it might trigger punitive action. People suspect that our sovereignty will be sold out to the Chinese due to our government’s passiveness on the issue. 

Jimenez has been a garbage hunter, if you will, for decades now. As the cliché goes, “one man’s trash is another man’s treasure.” While randomly selecting used materials from junkyards, he has to have a gut feel on which items to choose — although a creative mind like his no doubt already have an idea on how to tackle a plethora of things that can be used to interplay with each other to depict a huge creative concept. 

‘[Jimenez] gave new life to scrap material by reconfiguring their creative potential into a platform for expressing a political opinion.’

The discovery of materials came before the formulation of the concept. I would think this was the case in the Jimenez installation at the Ateneo Art Gallery. 

He gave new life to scrap material by reconfiguring their creative potential into a platform of expressing a political opinion. Incidentally, the donated rescue boats were supposed to be used for military defense operations, but their usefulness was overturned by their obsolescence. We just hope that there were no accidents like drowning during their use as rescue boats, just like what happened to Huey helicopters donated by US Army to the Armed Forces of the Philippines, which were like flying coffins due to many accidents while they were in operation. 

“Islands for Sale” as a thematic expression is very timely. Just recently, some 200 Chinese ships bearing militia visited the West Philippine Sea. The question is: Were there trade-offs? Were these islands already sold by the government to China? 

By allowing the ships on our exclusive economic zones, we have practically allowed China to invade the Philippines without it firing a single shot. 

Pete Jimenez — who’s known for his satirical approach to many of his assemblage and sculptural oeuvres out of found materials from junkyards — has come up with a very timely installation in these troubled times amid the COVID-19 pandemic. This would stir up discussions and draw support in protesting the virtual sellout of our sovereignty by our leaders, who have made a mockery of its patriotic duty to defend the country from invaders.

By the way, it’s not only the West Philippine Sea that has been grabbed by the Chinese, foreign investors are now allowed to own land and water properties in the country, courtesy of the Congress of the Philippines. The whole Philippine Islands are now for sale. Pete Jimenez has done his share in fulfilling his duties not only as a citizen but as an artist to make a difference.

Topics: Islands for Sale , Pete Jimenez , United States , Mutual Defense Pact , China
COMMENT DISCLAIMER: Reader comments posted on this Web site are not in any way endorsed by The Standard. Comments are views by readers who exercise their right to free expression and they do not necessarily represent or reflect the position or viewpoint of While reserving this publication’s right to delete comments that are deemed offensive, indecent or inconsistent with The Standard editorial standards, The Standard may not be held liable for any false information posted by readers in this comments section.