PH mobile internet makes 14-notch jump in Speedtest Global Index

posted January 22, 2021 at 06:00 pm
by  Manila Standard
Ookla Speedtest Global Index just reported an impressive 14-notch jump in the Philippines’ ranking in mobile Internet connection speed.  

The country’s average mobile Internet speed in December 2020 registered at 22.50 megabits per second (Mbps) compared to 18.49 Mbps in November 2020. 

With a total of 118 million tests conducted in all of the country’s regions, cities and municipalities throughout 2020, the monthly increase in speed of 4Mbps for mobile from November to December was the highest monthly increase since July 2016. 

The improvement in mobile internet connection pulled the country’s rank up the past month to 29th from 34th out of 50 Asian countries and to 18th from 22nd out of 46 Asia Pacific countries. 

The change comes after the President’s directive last July 2020 on the need to expedite the facilitation of LGU permits in relation to building cellular towers. Since then, there has been a significant increase in the issuance of permits from July to December 2020 vis-à-vis the average monthly numbers of permits issued in 2019. 

The National Telecommunications Commission reported that in 2019, a monthly average of 63 permits were issued for Globe and a monthly average of 50 for Smart. However, the average monthly number of permits issued on July to December 2020 rose by 552.65% (348 permits) for Globe and 194.33% (97 permits) for Smart.  

The fast-tracking of the issuance of permits resulted in an increase in building cellular towers. From July to December 2020, a total of 2,939 additional towers/physical sites were built. 

The country has a total of 22,834 cellular tower/sites to date with Globe having 10,395, Smart and DITO having 10,079 and 2,360 respectively. 

Telcos also continue to invest heavily on their fiber-optic network with a total of 543,740 cable-kilometers already laid out all over the country to date.  Smart/PLDT currently has the widest network with 429,270 cable-kilometers of fiber optic built. Globe has laid-out 67,414 cable-kilometers, Converge with 33,000 and DITO with 14,056. 

In 2020 alone, a total of 144,551 cable-kilometers of fiber optic were rolled-out with Smart/PLDT adding 106,914 cable-kilometers, Globe with 13,414, Converge with 10,167, and DITO with 14,056 cable-kilometers more.

The government’s Common Tower Policy is also aimed at generating faster rollout of telco infrastructure to meet the increasing demand for mobile internet services.  Building additional towers is seen to be essential in drastically increasing internet speeds to enable the country to be more competitive globally. 

Globe said that it has finalized partnerships with 11 tower companies, while Smart signified that it has already agreements with 9 tower companies.

DITO’s launch commercially on March 2021 has also prompted incumbents Globe and Smart to increase capital expenditures significantly with Globe set to spend P90 billion, and Smart P92 billion in 2021.  Both investments are the highest annually for each telco for the past six years. 

DITO, meanwhile, plans to go head on with the incumbents fulfilling its commitment of spending P150 billion in 2020 for its infrastructure roll-out.

The NTC instructed all telcos to submit their respective roll-out plans for this year last 20 January 2021, a move to enable the Commission closely monitor telcos’ progress in helping improve the country’s internet speed further.  The Commission said that it shall extend telcos any assistance for the smooth implementation of their roll-out plans. 

Topics: Ookla Speedtest Global Index , mobile Internet connection speed , National Telecommunications Commission
COMMENT DISCLAIMER: Reader comments posted on this Web site are not in any way endorsed by The Standard. Comments are views by thestandard.ph readers who exercise their right to free expression and they do not necessarily represent or reflect the position or viewpoint of thestandard.ph. While reserving this publication’s right to delete comments that are deemed offensive, indecent or inconsistent with The Standard editorial standards, The Standard may not be held liable for any false information posted by readers in this comments section.