Brussels, Belgium—Britain stood by its provocative bid to change the terms of its EU divorce deal on Monday, as a make-or-break week of post-Brexit trade talks began under a storm cloud.
European Commission chief Ursula von der Leyen insisted though that a deal was still possible following a meeting in Lisbon with Portuguese Prime Minister Antonio Costa.
The British government unveiled an “Internal Markets Bill” last month which is winding its way through parliament and would override parts of the Brexit treaty that British Prime Minister Boris Johnson struck with the European Union last year.
The proposed law has infuriated the Europeans—who have demanded that it be withdrawn or amended before a deadline of Wednesday this week.
But after meeting with EU Commission vice-president Maros Sefcovic in Brussels earlier, senior British minister Michael Gove insisted it would not be changed.
“Those clauses are there. They’re in legislation supported by the House of Commons as a safety net if need be and those clauses will remain in that bill,” Gove told reporters after the talks.
Von der Leyen called for “responsibility.”
“We want an agreement and I’m still convinced that an agreement is possible,” she said.
Both Britain and the 27-member bloc have seen their economies “severely hit by the pandemic, and we should do everything possible to find an agreement that is manageable, so that we do not increase the negative impact on our economies,” she added.
Johnson argues the “Internal Markets Bill” will provide a “safety net” against what he claimed are EU threats to impose tariffs on UK internal trade and even stop food going from mainland Britain to Northern Ireland—although his government has admitted that in overwriting a treaty it breaks international law.
For the EU, Sefkovic said that Brussels would not be the first to walk away from trade talks, but he stood by the EU threat that it would use the legal mechanisms within the exit treaty against Britain.
“We maintain that the bill if adopted in its current form would constitute an extremely serious violation of the (withdrawal bill) and of international law,” Sefcovic said after the talks with Gove.
“We are considering all legal options available to us,” he said.
But Sefcovic accepted that the parallel legal battle would not torpedo the ongoing trade talks. “It would never be the EU which would cause the end of the negotiation on the future partnership,” he said.