Compromise or compromised?

"What is the real reason behind Namfrel's move?"



The Commission on Elections has recently been under fire amide news that the National Movement for Free Elections will no longer serve as the citizens’ arm for next week’s midterm elections.

According to reports, Namfrel declined its accreditation because the Comelec did not allow it to gain access to sensitive information.

Namfrel expressed its thanks for the accreditation, but said “without open access to information and data, petitioner Namfrel is unable to participate in the random manual audit because its inaccessibility diminishes the verifiability separately provided during the RMA.”

My gulay, Namfrel has been the Comelec’s citizen arm since the 1980s! It has been an election tradition to have Namfrel verify election results.

At first impression, it sounds like the Comelec is doing some sort of obfuscation, but we all have to remember that in previous elections, Namfrel was given access to sensitive data. The RMAs done with the guidance of the Philippine Statistics Authority all turned out fine.

So this begs the question. Why does Namfrel need access to sensitive data? Is there no compromise that can be reached, especially since it is the duty of the Comelec to protect the data of the electorate?

Namfrel’s act of declining the accreditation shows that it wants all or nothing. They are definitely not open to compromise. Then again, Namfrel National Chairman Gus Lagman may have a few ideas of his own.

Now that the Comelec fully owns the Automated Election System, having restricted Smartmatic to a very limited role, Namfrel’s vigilance is needed more than ever.

This will be the first time that the Comelec will run the whole automated election practically by itself. Not having a citizen arm will put the Comelec in a position that would make it hard to defend the legitimacy of the AES.

At the risk of sounding like a conspiracy theorist, such a scenario would benefit Namfrel. The chairman of Namfrel has established for himself the reputation of being a crusader against electoral fraud. Noble, indeed.

We have to remember, however, that Lagman has been peddling around the Precinct Automated Tallying System which was tested, and which spectacularly failed on June 27, 2015.

PATaS is a hybrid election system—manual counting and automated transmission. It was proposed to the Comelec as an alternative to Smartmatic’s system. It was rejected because it was much slower and more prone to human error and intervention. It was also more expensive to maintain than what the Comelec was using back then.

Intuitively, I agree with the Comelec. Why would we go back to manual when we are already finally at a point where the process is fully automated and fast? Santa Banana, that is the opposite of progress!

That does not mean I am not open to changing the technology provider. But if it’s a step in the wrong direction, it is better to stick to what we have for now while looking somewhere else.

So as much as I would like to think that Namfrel’s intentions in declining are for the good of the people, its link with PATaS casts a shadow of doubt.

Given the ties of some people to a system that has been rejected by the Comelec, it would seem convenient for some people to make up excuses to not support the Comelec and set it up for perceived failure.

Again, I am not a conspiracy theorist. But perhaps the intention would be clearer if the bearer of the message is not as compromised.

* * *

On or before the weekend, Social Weather Stations and Pulse Asia will again release results of their surveys on the Senate race.

Although I must say that their findings are not cast in stone, they still tend to create a bandwagon effect on some people.

I am not saying that poll surveys should not be believed. They serve a purpose: To enable those lagging behind to do better, and those on top to work even harder to maintain their position.

But to have survey results come out just before election day is something else. This is why I believe there should be a law that bans polls a month before elections. They can only create a bandwagon mentality for many.

At this point, most of the electorate have already made up their minds on whom to vote for. Sadly, for the masa, election day is something else. It is the time when they can get something in exchange for their votes.

It’s really tragic to know that vote-buying remains prevalent in both rural and urban areas.

I am not predicting anything. All I am saying is that voters should not be swayed by surveys. There are so many imponderables in our kind of elections.

I also hope that the winners would remember that their duty is to defend and uphold the Constitution, not to defend any individual.

The country needs more independent-minded senators rather than alalays or lackeys.

* * *

Two members of Otso Diretso who I believe should be in the Senate are Chel Diokno and Erin Tanada.

Both are scions of senators who made their name in politics through independence, integrity and honesty.

In a democracy, there must be assent and dissent. Without these, there could only be tyranny.

Unfortunately, those who do get into the Senate are not who we wish for.

It’s really poverty dragging down the nation—poor people have the attitude that elections are a time for them to get something in exchange for their votes,

* * *

There are many horror stories about the Chinese in the Philippines.

For example, there were reports that two Chinese nationals were smoking at a fastfood chain. They ignored the waiter who told them that smoking was not allowed. When the guard approached then, they offered money to the guard!

They must think all Filipinos can be bribed!

And then, some Chinese nationals are reportedly going around gated villages offering homeowners rental fees way above the current rate, and paid in advance at that!

Some homeowners have reportedly accepted these offers.

Topics: Commission on Elections , Rodrigo Duterte , Precinct Automated Tallying System
COMMENT DISCLAIMER: Reader comments posted on this Web site are not in any way endorsed by Manila Standard. Comments are views by readers who exercise their right to free expression and they do not necessarily represent or reflect the position or viewpoint of While reserving this publication’s right to delete comments that are deemed offensive, indecent or inconsistent with Manila Standard editorial standards, Manila Standard may not be held liable for any false information posted by readers in this comments section.
AdvertisementGMA-Working Pillars of the House