SEC probes loan deal in Medical City row

The Securities and Exchange Commission is investigating a loan agreement signed by Clermont, a Singapore-based holdings group, and a director Professional Services Inc., operator of the Medical City,  amid the brewing shareholder conflict in the hospital, the former hospital management said.

The SEC formed a special hearing panel, represented by the Enforcement and Investor Protection, Market Securities and Research, and Corporate Governance and Finance Departments, with the mandate to “resolve the rightful ownership of shares of Professional Services Inc.”  

The probe of the loan transaction is allegedly key to determine whether or not the shares of the block identified with the Clermont conglomerate were validly and legally acquired.

The probe stemmed from the petition filed by the erstwhile president and chief executive of the Medical City who said the $38-million loan was given by the Singaporean firm to Medical City treasurer Jose Xavier Gonzales allegedly under “questionable” terms.

Dr. Alfredo Bengzon, the former president, earlier called on Gonzales “to bare the truth” regarding the “real intention” of the loan from Viva Holdings, saying the transaction may have “failed to protect the interest of the company.” Viva Holdings is part of the Clermont Group, an international finance services and retail conglomerate.

Bengzon said in his petition the group, through allegedly “fraudulent, deceptive and manipulative actions, acquired and increased their shareholding from at least 35 percent to more than 50 percent”.

The SEC SHP is probing Bengzon’s allegations that Gonzales had admitted that the $38-million loan given him by Viva was used for the acquisition of additional shares for his own holding company. Bengzon said Gonzales also admitted that the loan had been since “satisfied,” but questioned the terms of the “satisfaction.”

Bengzon alleged that under the loan agreement, the loan and all accrued interest could be converted into one share of Gonzales’ HK company. Gonzales could then buy back that share from Viva for only HK$101, if he was able to deliver to Viva an amended articles of incorporation of PSI, where the corporation’s right of first refusal was removed.

“Gonzales should explain why he got away with paying the measly amount of HK$100 for a $38 million,” Bengzon said. Bengzon branded the transaction the “deal of the century”.

The SEC is also probing the related Cooperation and Shareholders’ Agreement entered into by Gonzales and Viva Holdings, following allegations that the agreement was not “promptly and fully disclosed” to the board and shareholders. 

Based on the Bengzon petition, the CSA, “proves that Gonzales and Viva Holdings were acting in concert” and that this enabled them to acquire a majority share of the corporation in a manner that violated Philippine laws under the Securities Regulation Code designed to protect investor rights.

Topics: Securities and Exchange Commission , SEC , Medical City , loan agreement , Clermont
COMMENT DISCLAIMER: Reader comments posted on this Web site are not in any way endorsed by Manila Standard. Comments are views by readers who exercise their right to free expression and they do not necessarily represent or reflect the position or viewpoint of While reserving this publication’s right to delete comments that are deemed offensive, indecent or inconsistent with Manila Standard editorial standards, Manila Standard may not be held liable for any false information posted by readers in this comments section.
AdvertisementGMA-Congress Trivia 1